The hijacking or outlawing of true grass root movement

From Wikinormous

Revision as of 11:40, 22 March 2012 by Oscar berven (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ←Older revision | Current revision (diff) | Newer revision→ (diff)

Much focus on other posts concerning false flag operation, agent provocateur and elite organizations dressed up as grass root movement will be addressed and summed up here. More and more articles bring up these issues, and not just wikinormous giving it attention. Many are very busy in this type of infiltration, in fact both for good and for bad, just as one would expect in our conspiratorial world.

what's in a name? or the bad aspect

Namepicking and the very predicament in organizing any type of movement, this is the critical issue in any human interaction. The corruptible and co-optible, the infiltration, diversion, or ridiculing from within. In its most extreme even a single person (in one persons name) can be co-opted. This can be done very intentionally with an agenda but also quite unintentionally, by misunderstanding or lack of knowledge and insight. And also all above mentioned must be proclaimed, in some way. It has to be known publicly. Today it really just need to be uttered on the internet. The slightest intention, and a name, and wham, you can get emotional responses. It can later be called, phenomena or collectively be reduced to keywords, buzzwords, politicized ... e.g. blogosphere, mainstream, truthers, this-and-that deniers, government, grass root, the official version ... And by now any type of divide and conquer can be applied, the 'us and them'. This text is hardly free from it.


”This calculated and synchronised move toward a brave new world is not a bottom-up thing, somehow evolving naturally from the grass roots, it is a top-down system, posing as grass roots, to be imposed on as large an audience as it can reach through the use of mass media, schooling systems and other available instruments of propaganda.” Jurriaan Maessen, on UNESCO [1] as hijacking example.

Who is behind Moldova's Twitter Revolution?

Many western interest via diverse intelligence agencies and NGOs may have use of a less Moscow friendly government in Moldova. So an uprising for a possible regime change may not be only wanted but incited and even funded. The Ossetia turmoil tells similar story.

”Russian accusations regarding the involvement of Western intelligence agencies has not been proved because all clandestine operations operate on the principle of plausible denial. Nonetheless, there are circumstantial facts which seem to demonstrate foreign intervention. For instance, some Western semi official institutions and NGO's openly acknowledged their activities in Moldova.” José Miguel Alonso Trabanco

You are being lied to about pirates

”This is the context in which the men we are calling “pirates” have emerged. Everyone agrees they were ordinary Somalian fishermen who at first took speedboats to try to dissuade the dumpers and trawlers, or at least wage a “tax” on them. They call themselves the Volunteer Coast Guard of Somalia - and it’s not hard to see why.”

”In a surreal telephone interview, one of the pirate leaders, Sugule Ali, said their motive was “to stop illegal fishing and dumping in our waters … We don’t consider ourselves sea bandits. We consider sea bandits [to be] those who illegally fish and dump in our seas and dump waste in our seas and carry weapons in our seas.” William Scott would understand those words.” Johann Hari

What almost always will happen is that plain gangsters and hooligans will grab a piece of the action, and media coverage will seldom talk of the genuine activism. Obama naturally stepping in with righteous piety claiming accountability for those who commit acts of piracy. We gotta wonder though who's ”piracy” is really the most treacherous and under what definition of piracy (privacy) does he come judging.

Speaking of Obama and one of the most sinister hijackings of all. Youth movement. Military service is bad enough, but further ”civil defence” and propagandizing down the ages and Manipulating children's devotion. We can never say grass root when top rule is apparent ...

ubiquitous devotion

” ... citizenship is not an entitlement program, it comes with responsibilities ... everybody somewhere between the ages of 18-25 will serve three months basic training and understanding in a kind of civil defence ...” Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel

Alex Jones' The Obama Deception

on Googlevideo

  • The GIVE Act for ”... fair, and reasonable mandatory service requirement for all able young people ...” March 18, 2009
  • Scouts Train to Fight Terrorists, and More. by Jennifer Steinhauer May 13, 2009

What is City Year?

City Year unites young people of all backgrounds for a year of full-time service, giving them skills and opportunities to change the world. Part of americorps and

Alex Jones lays it out, from National ”voluntary” Service to City Year to Americorps et al. from Infowars may 18 2009 (22 min clip).

Brown does Obama does Hitler does ...

”It is my ambition to create a Britain in which there is a clear expectation that all young people will undertake some service to their community, and where community service will become a normal part of growing up in Britain. ... And, by doing so, the contributions of each of us will build a better society for all of us.” Gordon Brown

”local community organisations and charities.” i.e National Youth Service on the horizon 2011, should Labour be in power next term. It rings eerily similar to Common Purpose and Demos et al. it also connects to the ever hijacking of natural grass root movements that are in themselves (i.e. should be) holarchical and idealistic rather than covertly driven through hierarchical collectivism. A deceptive way of making voluntarism mandatory by law or by societal group think (pressure).

why mainstream goes ”fringe”

Why does Hannity talk of ”conspiracy theorists being right”, Glenn Beck talks of Algorism and banking elite, or Ann Coulter is all over Ron Paul? Could it be yet more of hijacking tactics where confusion and disinformation and diversion is necessary to fight the real grass root due to its size and methods of spreading fast over internet?

”Well, if you want to get a revolt going, why not disclose false flag terror (such as Michael Savage started to do recently for the first time on his radio show where he foretold Obama’s upcoming Reichstag)? That sure would do it if the mass media went that far and all-at-once got this the real-ness of false flag terror into the minds of the sappy and unfocussed citizenry, shocking them to the core by totally upsetting their established belief system, all right when that citizenry was destitute, in a depression, filled with bird flu epidemic fears, with millions living tent cities, hungry and cold, and so on, as is most likely going to be the case this fall or winter. Was Savage’s recent comment a prelude to this? ... It is quite obvious the New World Order is pushing for violence ...” Jeffrey Grupp

Environmental Movement

Wolf in sheep's clothes? Wildlife and land preservations via INGO/NGO and other UN flagged organizations play the bad conscience game we quickly adhere to by its innocence and morality. WWF directly addresses this and particularly exploit kids who naturally relate to wildlife and animals, especially cubs and kittens. So the open agenda inherently seems all for the well being of nature and us in it, or are there other plans in the works? I would contend that most of these land/animal conservation initiatives are perfectly innocent in them selves, but as much these days become centralized and globalized, they are dangerously being hijacked by an altogether other agenda.

  • Watch Taking Liberty, How Private Property is being Abolished in America
yet another 2 million acres in nine states, for the protection of wilderness ... and counting, H.R.146 and
  • George Hunt's UN UNCED Earth Summit 1992 on Googlevideo (36 min)

the dubious judgment

In comes terminology like ”phenomenon and trends of homegrown violent radicalization”, echoing from DHS (department of homeland security) to the halls of UN and spread over the globe. Below follows links scoping the trends hopefully putting light from ”the other side”, that from the individual person, who genuinely may have critique against just the methods and means which is said to ”protect us from terrorism and threats to our freedoms”.

”Let me be very clear: we monitor the risks of violent extremism taking root here in the United States. We don’t have the luxury of focusing our efforts on one group; we must protect the country from terrorism whether foreign or homegrown, and regardless of the ideology that motivates its violence.” Janet Napolitano DHS

Frankly not badly put, but, in her Obama Piety Disorder, forgets that DHS, FEMA, NSA and numerous letter organizations incl acts and bills, FISA, ACTA, H.R 875, Patriot Act, IPRED, FRA, (no)Habeas Corpus [2] etc, is our biggest terrorism threat! We can assume she never fully will stand by her words.

”We are on the lookout for criminal and terrorist activity but we do not – nor will we ever – monitor ideology or political beliefs. We take seriously our responsibility to protect the civil rights and liberties of the American people, including subjecting our activities to rigorous oversight from numerous internal and external sources.”

Could that oversight be Congress, Pentagon, UN? Besides the ”neutrality” of the DHS report (from michelle malkin's blog) talks of ”rightwing extremism”, right on the cover, not so well put.

  • Veterans react to the DHS report.


alternative media
A term used to describe various information sources that provide a forum for interpretations of events and issues that differ radically from those presented in mass media products and outlets.

  • The MIAC report specifically describes supporters of presidential candidates Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin, and Bob Barr as “militia” influenced terrorists and instructs the Missouri police to be on the lookout for supporters displaying bumper stickers and other paraphernalia associated with the Constitutional, Campaign for Liberty, and Libertarian parties.

  • USA har fått sin förste svarte president och detta i kombination med den kraftigt sviktande konjukturen har inneburit ett uppsving för högerextrema grupper i landet, hävdar departementet för inrikessäkerhet i en rapport.

  • Coordination between government agencies must become even better and new methods must be tested to counteract segregation, discrimination and exclusion, which always risk forming a breeding ground for violent radicalisation. Carl Bildt & Beatrice Ask

... so, my judgment (probably equally dubious), with every radical measure from minority groups comes equally radical from majority. Every governmental move for means of control is a radical reaction like any above given group. ”Increased radicalization” balances out from either party.

”Occupy Yourself – Not The Streets” Andrew Dawson

To actually create your way out of the predicament that big big brother is as real today as your bank account is, will make the control factor impossible. Don't create headlines in the newspaper about latest G8 meeting protests. Create innovation and novelty thinking at the dinner table at home. Be and do the paradigm shift. Inspire! Spread it locally. Do it today! Control factor will thus be minimized. The agent provocateurs, violent incitements, false flags, hooligans and hijackers would get little stronghold in true grass root movement

The means justify the end.

“If you are still fighting the system, you are still caught within it” David Icke

Pre-pre-crime, with FBI pamphlets

The absurdities and slippery slope fallacies have gone full circle and the very act trying to prevent so called 'homegrown terrorism and radicalization', i.e. looking, collecting data, taking notes about possible suspicious behavior in itself becomes invasive, terrorizing and indeed quite 'suspicious'. Below one of 25 FBI/BJA flyers from early 2012 telling us what to consider suspicious behavior in a variety of every day situations ranging from hotels, internet cafes, shopping malls or hobby shops [3];

”Gather information about individuals without drawing attention to yourself”

So, what ever you do, don't let others (that might have read these pamphlets) spot your potential ”suspicious activity” – trying to spot others suspicious activities – (one of many signs of a societal system crash/kernel panic). On the other hand if you act as normal as you can, that could well be added suspiciousness, in 'trying to blend in'.

It is not easy to live in a world replete with contradictions and fallacies and catch 22s. War on terror, who watches the watchmen, military peace force or ”Either you are with us or you are with the terrorists” Who and what determines real suspicious behavior, terrorism and intimidation? I suppose we all should do what they urge us to do in the last bullet;

”If something seems wrong, notify law enforcement authorities.”

A lot is wrong. Obviously you can't go to the 'enforcement authorities', they will naturally deem you an 'enemy combatant'; extreme pacifist, left/right/middle-wing blogger who loves a good espresso (for cash) at the local barista place reading ”revolutionary literature”, skype-chatting on your cellphone. I suppose you have to go to your closest friends and family and tell them where the real terror threat comes from and the utterly dangerous and fascistic and fallacious rhetoric, moral and implementation practices.

”It is important to remember that just because someone’s speech, actions, beliefs, appearance, or way of life is different; it does not mean that he or she is suspicious.”

But the damage is done. The tone is set. The 'report society' (when ubiquitous surveillance does not suffice) is upon us. It is beyond Minority Report 'pre-crime' (before really) because now the only requisite for being 'detained' is to have a certain behavior whether you have any terror plans or not, basically in any everyday normal activity, (echoing 'confessions' under torture, guilty or innocent matters little under such pressure). And subsequently you can be detained indefinitely, without further evidence of anything. Pre-pre-crime


How to Divide and Conquer The Corbett Report 2010 08 08

<comments />